<p>There's a growing feeling on the left, particularly in younger circles, that many longtime Democratic senators and congressmen are Republican in <a href="http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/381410-can-democrats-survive-an-assault-from-the-left" target="_blank">everything but name</a>. Corporate donors <a href="https://www.gq.com/story/democrats-harvey-weinstein" target="_blank">fund Democratic campaigns</a>. The DNC has <a href="https://www.usnews.com/opinion/thomas-jefferson-street/articles/2017-08-10/democrats-still-dont-get-why-they-lost-the-working-class-to-donald-trump" target="_blank">lost touch with the working class</a>, which is supposed to be their core constituency. And, Democrats hide behind their <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/29/politics/democrats-white-working-class/index.html" target="_blank">socially liberal views</a>, never addressing the underlying economic realities of the minority groups they claim to support. Considering the torrent of political sound bites we've heard over the past two and a half years, it's easy to forget <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBrk2Vz2ASk" target="_blank">this one</a>, in which Nancy Pelosi (minority leader in the House of Representatives) responds to a question about the Democratic Party potentially shifting left on economic issues with "sorry, but we're capitalists." I think it's one of the most politically revealing clips CNN has ever published, the implication being that Democrats aren't even open to <em>hearing</em> an argument that doesn't comport with their worldview.</p><p><div id="ezoic-pub-ad-placeholder-143"></div>
<!-- End Ezoic - incontent2 - long_content --></p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image">
<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8xODE3NTYxMi9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYyNjg1MjYyN30.ARYhe5FM-83xFQGPeGFEoVpe_u2pOj3oXA7Zgn4HjAM/img.jpg?width=980" id="4a2ca" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="2cea15527bd0c61c704fc6b017420138" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image">
<small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="add caption...">Sorry, we're capitalist.</small></p><p>The problem for the Democrats is, Bernie Sanders' 2016 campaign breathed new life into the Socialist movement, and Ocasio-Cortez, while this years' most notable winner, is far from the only Socialist running for public office. <a href="https://forward.com/fast-forward/404873/is-this-latina-jew-the-next-alexandria-ocasio-cortez/" target="_blank">Julia Salazar is running</a> for the New York State Senate, <a href="https://www.saraforpa.com/priorities" target="_blank">Sara Innamorato is running</a> for the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, and there are plenty of other candidates aiming to move the Democratic party leftwards. Interestingly, the fledgling Democratic Socialist movement has taken a strategy out of <a href="https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/republicans-now-control-most-state-and-federal-political-offices/2632108.html" target="_blank">the Republican playbook</a> and is hyper-focused on local and state elections. While it's easy to be cynical and assume the DSA (Democratic Socialists of America) is only doing this because they don't have the juice to participate on the national stage, it's worth pointing out that Democrats <a href="https://ballotpedia.org/Partisan_composition_of_state_legislatures" target="_blank">tend to get clobbered in state elections</a>, and that the DSA's strategy is a welcomed change of pace.<br></p><p><div id="ezoic-pub-ad-placeholder-145"></div>
<!-- End Ezoic - incontent3 - longer_content --></p><p>But will these progressives be able to work within the Democratic party, or will they split it in two? If the prevailing media sentiments are to be believed, then the answer is the latter. In the wake of Ocasio-Cortez's victory, there's been a wave of <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/27/opinions/democrats-should-not-tack-left-cunningham/index.html" target="_blank">think pieces</a> by many a prominent essayist asserting that if the Democratic Party veers too far left, it risks losing to Trump again in 2020. After Ocasio-Cortez's win, Illinois <a href="https://www.vox.com/2018/7/2/17527254/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-win-duckworth-midwest-democratic-socialist" target="_blank">Senator Tammy Duckworth said </a>"I think that you can't win the White House without the Midwest, and I don't think you can go too far to the left and still win the Midwest," adding that the Democrats' 2020 presidential candidate has to speak to the "industrial Midwest." Ocasio-Cortez <a href="https://twitter.com/Ocasio2018/status/1013540404879396865" target="_blank">fired back</a> with some snark–like many 28-year-olds she's very good on Twitter– but to focus on the acrimonious exchange between the two politicians, risks overlooking Duckworth's original point. Why shouldn't the "industrial Midwest" want universal healthcare or a higher minimum wage? Bernie Sanders <a href="https://www.cnn.com/election/2016/primaries/parties/democrat" target="_blank">won large chunks</a> of the midwest when he was campaigning against Hillary on the exact same platforms. Duckworth's ill-conceived attack on Ocasio-Cortez echoes an uncomfortable belief that's been <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/10/democrats-working-class-americans-us-election" target="_blank">fermenting just beneath the surface of the Democratic party for some time</a>. That is, that working class voters are too stupid to act in their own self interest.</p><p><div id="ezoic-pub-ad-placeholder-147"></div>
<!-- End Ezoic - incontent4 - longest_content --></p><p>Ocasio-Cortez's victory could very well create a schism within the Democratic party. Her views, and the views of those like her aren't particularly compatible with those of establishment Democrats. That said, when Bernie lost in the primary, <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2016/07/11/politics/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders/index.html" target="_blank">he endorsed Hillary Clinton</a>. Most of the hand wringing about the Democrats not having a unified front for 2020 is nonsense. It assumes two things, both erroneous. One, that diversity of ideas is a negative within a political party. Two, that Socialist supporters lack the capacity to choose between the lesser of two evils. You'd be hard pressed to find a Democratic Socialist who if forced to choose between a Democratic mainstay like Joe Biden or another four years of Trump wouldn't pick the former every time. </p><p><div id="ezoic-pub-ad-placeholder-163"> </div>
<!-- End Ezoic - incontent_5 - incontent_5 --></p><p>While the American political class has been reeling from the shock of Trump's election, Socialists have managed to carve out a niche for themselves. It remains to be seen whether or not they can get anything done within the Democratic party, but any move leftward will be a welcomed change of pace. For the first time in since 2016, there seems to be a glimmer of hope in American politics.</p>Related Articles Around the Web
KEEP READING...
Show less