Swifties, this one’s for you. It seems like Taylor Swift's Eras Tour has lasted eons. Yet somehow, there’s always something to talk about. Just thinking about how much she’s accomplished while on tour makes me want to buckle down, lock in, and channel my inner girlboss. But while I can’t even be bothered to cook dinner at home after a long day of work, Taylor is accomplishing milestones most musicians can only dream of. Let’s recap.
The Era’s Tour began in March 2023 with its North American leg. It’s set to go until December 2024, with dates in Europe, Australia, Asia, and South America— spanning 152 shows across five continents.
As the queen of multitasking, Swift hasn’t stopped at just selling out stadiums. Since the Eras tour began, she’s released multiple albums — both new and old — and shaken up the tour setlist with each new release. Her list of new releases started on the first day of tour with “All Of The Girls You Loved Before,” which was quickly followed up by “The Alcott,” a feature on The National’s album — reciprocity for their work on her pandemic era albums, Folklore and Evermore.
She also released Midnights: Late Night Edition (including the iconic collab with Ice Spice), as well as not one but two album re-releases — Speak Now Taylor's Version and 1989 Taylor's Version. As if that wasn’t enough, she announced her latest album, The Tortured Poet’s Department, in a GRAMMY’s acceptance speech. Talk about legendary. Since its release, she’s also been churning out deluxe versions and remixes to keep us on our toes. The Eras Tour was even made into a Blockbuster film that brought Beyonce to its premiere. Star power: confirmed.
But that’s just her work life. Her personal life is just as eventful. She ended her 7-year relationship with Joe Alwyn in April 2023. Then entered into a brief but controversial fling with 1975 frontman Matty Healy. Though it didn’t last long, the relationship was enough to inspire a whole album and catapult her into her current romance with Travis Kelce, aka Amerca’s first nepo boyfriend. Now they’re the American Royal couple — and she somehow had time to fly from tour to his Super Bowl performance.
We all have the same hours in the day as Taylor Swift, but how she uses them will always be a mystery to me. I work eight hours a day and can barely manage a social life. Meanwhile, Taylor literally has it all — though conservatives are turning on her for daring to be a woman in her 30s who’s not married with kids. If that’s not proof that women can’t do anything right, I don’t know what is.
Clearly, she’s working late because she’s a singer. No wonder Taylor Swift became a billionaire months into her tour in October 2023. Her net worth is currently around 1.3 billion dollars, making her the only female musician to become a billionaire from her music.
Other entertainment billionaires like Rihanna, Kylie Jenner, Kim Kardashian, Jay-Z, and Kanye West have joined the three-comma club thanks to ventures like clothing brands, beauty products, and other entrepreneurial pursuits. Rihanna has her FENTY Empire. Kim has her award-winning SKIMS. Ye had Yeezy. But Taylor has an unbeatable catalog of publishing.
But Taylor isn’t just different from other Billionaires because of how she earned her money. She’s the Taylor we know and love because of how she spends it. Her rollercoaster Eras Tour is how she’s made much of her fortune. And she’s using it to give back in monumental degrees. From individual donations to investing in local infrastructure, Taylor is literally changing lives on a macro and micro scale. And teaching us what to expect from all billionaires in the process.
The Era’s Tour Bonuses — Talk About Workplace Benefits
First to make headlines were the Eras Tour crew bonuses. While some of us get rewarded with a pizza party or a $10 gift card to Starbucks, Taylor casually dropped $55 million in bonuses for her tour crew. The massive sum was paid out to everyone who makes the Eras Tour go around, from truck drivers to dancers and sound technicians.
In fairness, these bonuses are definitely well-deserved. Taylor’s shows are over three hours long. Imagine dancing for that long — because Swift certainly isn’t the one with the impressive moves — for hundreds of tour dates. Or remembering countless combinations of light cues to go with a setlist that changes daily. Yeah, they’re clocking in. And if my boss had millions to blow, I’d be expecting a comfortable bonus too. But $55 Million? That’s a testament to Swift’s generosity. It's like she's Oprah, but instead of cars, she's giving out life-changing amounts of cash. "You get a bonus! You get a bonus! Everybody gets a bonus!"
It’s similar to how Zendaya gave film equity to every member of the crew that worked on her controversial black-and-white drama, Malcolm & Marie. Filmed in a few days with a bare-bones crew during the peak of the pandemic, the film was Zendaya’s passion project with Sam Levinson, in which she starred alongside John David Washington. Though the film got mixed reviews, it captured the audience’s attention all the same. After all, it was Zendaya — and we’ll watch her in anything. So since the film sold to Netflix for a hefty sum, all the crew members got payouts from the deal on top of their salaries to reward their hard work.
Bonuses and equity payouts are common in many industries, but not entertainment. Even though it’s one of the most lucrative and recognizable American industries, most entertainers don’t make enough to survive. The SAG and WGA strikes last year were proof that there needs to be systemic change in the industry. LA County has even identified show businesses as risk factors for being unhoused — after all, how many stories do we hear of actors who were living in their cars before their big break? And for many, their big break never comes. For even more, they get hired on amazing gigs with giant performers … then go right back to the grind afterward. While individual actions from our favorite stars won’t fix everything, Zendaya and Taylor are providing models for how Hollywood should treat the people who make this town go round.
And in this economy, even a little bit could go a long way. Inflation and the cost of living are not a joke. Especially when, like with many creative careers, you often have to invest in lessons or equipment for your craft. With all this considered, the impact of Swirt’s donations can’t be overstated. Imagine getting a lump sum of cash for dancing to your favorite Taylor Swift tracks? Talk about a dream job.
The Economic Impact of Swift - Swiftonomics, if you will
Like Barbie and Beyonce last year, Swift is still on a tear to boost the economy of the cities she’s in just by traveling there — ad inspiring others to make the trek, too.
The Barbie movie proved that by marketing to women (instead of just making Marvel flops like Madame Web that aren’t really targeted to women at all), the entertainment industry can make giant profits. Barbie fever went beyond the theater. Thanks to a plethora of product collabs, the phenomenon rippled through retail.
Similarly, Beyonce’s Renaissance Tour tour generated an estimated $4.5 billion for the American economy. According to NPR, that’s almost as much as the entire 2008 Olympics earned for Beijing. People were taking money out of their 401ks to pay for Beyonce tickets and the glittery, silver-hues outfits to rock at her shows. Cities even started calling her effect the “Beyonce Bump.”
Swift has the same effect. She’s not just proving her generosity on a micro-scale for the people close to her, she’s having actual, tangible effects on the economy. It's like she's leaving a trail of dollar bills in her wake, and cities are scrambling to catch them like it's a country-pop, capitalist version of musical chairs.
The US Travel Association called it the Taylor Swift Impact after she generated over $5 Billion in just the first 5 months of the Eras Tour. But how does this work? It’s not like Taylor is printing more money at those shows, but it almost is. Her tour dates are pretty much economic steroid shots for local businesses. Hotels are booked solid, restaurants are packed, and let's not even get started on the surge in friendship bracelet supplies.
“Swifties averaged $1,300 of spending in local economies on travel, hotel stays, food, as well as merchandise and costumes,” say the US Travel Association. “That amount of spending is on par with the Super Bowl, but this time it happened on 53 different nights in 20 different locations over the course of five months.” That’s not to say anothing of her effect on the actual Super Bowl and the entire NFL season thanks to her ball-throwing boyfriend.
It's like she's created her own micro-economy, and everyone's invited to the party. And unlike some economic theories that rely on wealth trickling down (spoiler alert: it doesn't), Taylor's wealth is more like a t-shirt cannon or the confetti at her shows — showering everyone around.
Donations that actually do good
Taylor isn’t just stepping into cities and calling it a night. She’s also not just throwing pennies at problems - she's making significant contributions that are changing lives. And more importantly, she's using her platform to encourage her fans to do the same.
She kicked off her tour with quiet donations to food banks in Glendale, Ariz., and Las Vegas ahead of the Eras Tour. Once the tour was in full swing, she continued this practice. In Seattle, she donated to Food Lifeline, a local hunger relief organization. In Santa Clara, she showed some love to Second Harvest of Silicon Valley. And let's not forget about her $100,000 donation to the Hawkins County School Nutrition Program in Tennessee.
She’s been making similar donations overseas. Taylor Swift donated enough money to cover the food bills for an entire year across 11 food banks and & community pantries in Liverpool. Swift also covered 10,800 meals for Cardiff Foodbank and many more banks across the UK and EU. Her impact is so profound that her numbers are doing more to combat issues like hunger than the government.
Can billionaires actually be good?
One thing about me, I’m always ready and willing — knife and fork in hand — to eat the rich. Because fundamentally, can any billionaire really be good? In our late-stage capitalist horror story, the answer is usually no. Look how many of them are supporting the Trump campaign just to get some tax breaks.
But here's the thing - Taylor Swift might just be the exception that proves the rule. She's not perfect, sure. She still flies private jets and probably has a carbon footprint bigger than Bigfoot. But unlike most of the others in her tax bracket, she's not flaunting her wealth like it's a personality trait.
Take a look around. We've got billionaires trying to colonize Mars instead of, I don't know, helping people on Earth. In this context, Taylor's approach is more like Mackenzie Scott’s — Bezos’s ex-wife. She's not trying to escape to another planet - she's trying to make this one better.
And look, I'm not saying we should stop critiquing billionaires or the system that creates them. But she's just setting the bar for what we should expect from all billionaires. She's showing us that our collective power as fans can translate into real-world change. That our love for catchy choruses and bridge drops can somehow, improbably, lead to food banks getting funded and crew members getting life-changing bonuses.
So sorry to my neighbors who hear me belting “Cruel Summer” and “right where you left me” at the top of my lungs (and range). Just know it’s for the greater good.
Five Children's Stories That Will Blow Your Adult Mind
The children's stories we know and love have deeper political meanings than we ever thought possible.
We don't tend to think of children's stories as especially politically or philosophically meaningful. But many of the narratives we grew up listening to at bedtime contain deeper messages, ranging from social allegories to existential musings.
Through your nightly bedtime stories, you were absorbing more about the world than you ever thought possible! Here are some nostalgic children's stories that will blow your adult mind.
The Cat in the Hat...an existentialist philosophy text?Flickr/Daniel X. O'Neil
#1: Dr. Seuss' The Cat in the Hat
Dr. Seuss' playful, illustrated singsong rhymes often contain much more than meets the eye. In The Cat in the Hat, the world of a duo of siblings is turned upside down by an amoral cat. He and his oversized hat tempt the children with all kinds of deliciously not-allowed possibilities. The newly formed trio causes every kind of chaos before the children's mother returns—but first, the cat offers absolution via a magical vacuum cleaner. Every piece of evidence of their misbehavior is destroyed before an authority figure can see it.
So is the cat Satan? God? A political revolutionary? Our unconscious selves? Or simply proof that our existence, and our moral underpinnings, are ultimately meaningless? Perhaps there's some evidence of Dr. Seuss' position in the final lines, which turn to the reader to ask them if they'd tell their mother what really happened. The implication seems to be that we create our own meaning, and our own chaos, out of thin air. Our morals, the giant cat and his temptations seem to suggest, are ultimately up to us.
Curious George represented far more than a misadventurous monkey.Flickr/nist6dh
#2: Margret and H.A. Rey's The Complete Adventures of Curious George
A curious monkey, a trip from the African jungle to a "big city," a romping escape from the zoo, and playful adventures with a best friend—The Man in the Yellow Hat—that always end in forgiveness. Not much more to see here, right? Just a straightforward series about an animal and his best friend?
But the backstory behind the beloved Curious George stories is more adventurous and thrilling than any of the monkey's romps through the city. Translated from the original French (and with an original protagonist named Fifi), Curious George is based on the autobiographical experiences of Margret and Hans Rey, a Jewish couple who fled Paris during Nazi rule.
And George's misadventures? They're meant to reflect the Reys' narrow escape from the Nazi regime by bike, armed with only their heavy manuscript about—you guessed it—a playful monkey.
The Wizard of Oz originally had a connection to the 19th century Populist movement.Pixabay/skeeze
#3: L. Frank Baum's The Wonderful Wizard of Oz
Dorothy's harrowing visit to the land of Oz, by way of a yellow brick road straight out of Kansas, was first published by L. Frank Baum in 1900. Its fantasy elements, from a pair of witches both good and bad to a ragtag troupe of friends trying to find courage, wits, and love, appeal to children and teach basic morals about home and the importance of community values.
Some argue, however, that there's more than meets the eye when it comes to Dorothy's quest. Columbia University historian William Littlefield persuasively argued in the 1960s that the characters, places, and events in the pages of Baum's book all represented aspects of the growing populist movement in the late 19th century.
The populist movement, headed by primarily Midwestern "plain people" (such as farmers and ranchers), aimed to decentralize government control of banking. Dorothy represented one such populist, argued Littlefield. The ruby slippers, initially silver in Baum's book, symbolized the push from populists to add silver to the existing gold standard in order to decrease inflation. And, of course, the yellow brick road represented the gold standard itself in this extended allegory.
The Little Engine That Could may very well be an early feminist text.Flickr/Cliff
#4: Watty Piper's The Little Engine That Could
Watty Piper's The Little Engine That Could, the 1930 story of a train filled with gifts and toys for children that breaks down on the way to its destination, has an unexpected feminist twist. In a plot reminiscent of the Good Samaritan parable, the broken-down train's stranded passengers are passed over many times before finally getting help from a little blue train, also a "she."
The stuffed animals and dolls are rebuffed by the arrogant trains, who all say they have better things to do. Though the blue train is small, she reaches her destination, complete with toys and gifts, with the help of a simple chant: "I think I can." Yes, even an anthropomorphic train offered a metaphor for female empowerment in the early stages of the feminist movement.
Paddington Bear has a special connection to the immigrant experience.Pixabay/aitoff
#5: Michael Bond's A Bear Called Paddington
Michael Bond's beloved talking bear, who first came on the scene in 1958, represents much more than a lone orphaned bear left in a train station. Inspired by Bond's memories of child refugees leaving London during World War II with tiny suitcases in hand and nametags circling their necks, Paddington, himself from Peru, represents the experience of immigrants and refugees.
Given a new English name, Paddington is expected to assimilate into his newfound culture and even experiences discrimination from cab drivers and strangers alike. His loneliness and isolation represent what many immigrants feel in new lands. His arrival at Paddington Station is pointed, too: In the 1950s, many West Indian immigrants arrived in Britain at just that station, with the subsequent racial tensions and polarized climate ultimately ending in the devastating 1958 Notting Hill race riot.